NIL 9 - Paragraph/Dialogue Switching

4 min read

Deviation Actions

LadyNilstria's avatar
By
Published:
907 Views
I apologize for the wait. I was out of town over the weekend visiting some friends from overseas. They are so funny. Don't play card games with them. They may be Christians, but when it comes to cards, they will KILL YOU. XD

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Paragraph/Dialogue Switching

Format. Most writers don't think about it much. They think of it like structure. In the words of K.M. Weiland, "Most uninitiated writers have two different reactions to the idea of story structure. Either they think it's great, but too mystical and lofty to be understood by common mortals, or they think it is formulaic hooey that will sap the art right out of their books."

Many writers think of sentence and paragraph format in the same way. That's a bloody shame, because a good format, especially concerning dialogue, can greatly enhance the readability of the text.

After all, the goal of format is ease of reading. A bad format makes a confused reader. A good format is when the reader enjoys it but doesn't know why, like the difference between a Hershey bar and fine chocolate. Hershey's has ruined us. We must learn to accept nothing less than a masterfully tempered chocolate.

But how is good dialogue format accomplished? Though this sounds odd, rigidly. You have to have the determination to stick to the format you've chosen except in rare circumstances. I use the format I do because I believe it is the most expedient to be able to continue the narrative smoothly with the least possibility for confusion. I loathe diverging from it for this important reason: it trains the reader to my style. After a hundred pages, the reader will know the difference between a thing happening between dialogue and who actually talks. They won't do this consciously. It's a small, subdued response bordering on the innate.

I know this because I do it myself. I automatically know. When a writer has written a specific way for hundreds of pages, there is little reason to suppose he'll change it all of a sudden.

Here is an example of what I mean:

~~~~~

Richard winked at Mary. "What do you want?"

"A ship."

He started to walk away, gesturing for her to follow. "To where?" They rounded a corner. "Don't trip please."

"You don't need to know." She stepped over a box of empty milk bottles.

~~~~~

How many of you assumed someone else, probably Mary, spoke "a ship" instead of Richard simply because it was in a different paragraph? And that Richard said "don't trip please" because it wasn't put in a new paragraph? That is the power of format. When it comes to dialogue, it can be the deciding factor between a laborious conversation and a smooth one.

There are three rules for this depending on the circumstance. It also works well for action scenes.

1. Do not switch to a new paragraph unless the speaker has changed. This means not switching if another character does something between one person speaking UNLESS the paragraph gets too long. (This reduces the majority of confusion over the speaker and can also reduce unnecessary dialogue tags.)

2. Ignore #1 if another character does something between one person's dialogue that cannot be summed up in a SINGLE sentence. Ignore this rule if the action the character takes is extremely important and cannot be missed. Sometimes your most dramatic paragraphs are those single word sentences standing all by themselves.

3. ALWAYS switch to a new paragraph when the speaker has changed, no matter how often you have to. When you have two people talking back and forth at a breakneck pace (if you haven't experienced this, you will) than include an action beat or dialogue tag every three or four switches so the reader doesn't lose track of who is talking.

Here is a bad example of dialogue switching.

~~~~~

Richard tripped over a bottle and slammed into the wall. Mary rushed to him. "Are you okay?" He blinked. "I should probably clean up."

Mary sniffed. "Yes, you should."

~~~~~

Who said "are you okay" and "I should probably clean up"? You really don't have a clue. It should be like this.

~~~~~

Richard tripped over a bottle and slammed into the wall.

Mary rushed to him. "Are you okay?"

He blinked. "I should probably clean up."

Mary sniffed. "Yes, you should."

~~~~~

Now there is no question over who said and did what. That is the power of format.
© 2012 - 2024 LadyNilstria
Comments1
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Methemac's avatar
I absolutely agree.

Beware of the hatred of dialogue tags though. Dialogue tags are not as evil as they seem. Yes, the reader can skip over them, and they probably will, but they can provide a useful anchor that eliminates confusions in a lot of cases. In truth, you should use formatting COMBINED with a sprinkle of dialogue tags, as the two will ensure confusion does not happen and will keep the style from getting too redundant. I should note that in both examples, I had to stop and make sure I understood who was speaking. While format made this possible, it slowed me down because I had to make sure I was correct in my assumption. A dialogue tag would have sped up the process considerably.

"Listen kid, life isn't always fair," said John. <= dialogue tag to get us started

Ryan shrugged, a tear glistening in his eye. <= new name in new paragraph

"I don't care about fair! I need my dad in my life!" <= format guides reader, dialogue tag unneeded

"I didn't decide to start this war! Sometimes we have to do things we don't like..." <= format and voice

"I hate you," whispered Ryan. <= new dialogue tag achors reader, adds variety

John blinked back tears, clenched his fists and walked away. As he reached the door frame, he leaned against it, his head hanging as though he were ashamed of what he was about to say, but could not think of another way to put it. After a long silence, the words poured from his mouth. <= introduced by narration

"Well then maybe it's time you grew up." <= no tag needed, format, and intutive